Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
Date: 2022-08-05 05:25:08
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKP7jm7_YB68Op_1Mkk10MBDAC0sW3xJE4w2515OYz4Zw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 3:56 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:20 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think I'd feel more comfortable if you wrote the patch, if that's possible.
>
> Okay, pushed a fix just now.

FYI florican and lapwing showed:

2022-08-05 01:04:29.903 EDT [34485:5] FATAL: deduplication failed to
add heap tid to pending posting list
2022-08-05 01:04:29.903 EDT [34485:6] CONTEXT: WAL redo at 0/49708D8
for Btree/DEDUP: nintervals 4; blkref #0: rel 1663/16384/2674, blk 1

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-08-05 05:40:44 Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2022-08-05 05:13:46 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints