Re: EINTR in ftruncate()

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Date: 2022-07-14 13:02:29
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKNpK=2OMeea_AZwpLg7Bm4=gYWk7eDjZ5F6YbozfOf8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah. Done, and pushed. 0002 not back-patched.

Hmm, there were a couple of hard to understand build farm failures.
My first thought is that the signal mask stuff should only be done if
IsUnderPostmaster, otherwise it clobbers the postmaster's signal mask
when reached from dsm_postmaster_startup(). Looking into that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2022-07-14 13:04:02 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Previous Message David Geier 2022-07-14 12:45:29 Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions