On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 3:09 AM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:23 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Agreed. I added a line to break out of that loop if !block->in_use.
> >
> I think we should skip the block if !block->in_use. Because, the undo
> buffer can be registered in a subsequent block as well. For different
> operations, we can use different block_id to register the undo buffer
> in the redo record.
Oops, right. So it should just be added to the if condition. Will do.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com