Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Date: 2023-01-12 04:03:02
Message-ID: CA+hUKGK-gv8=_0FPe3MMZkncozmTNBRT7NhsKBt3vHZ5Dxu2=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:07 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. Here's v10. I'll wait a bit longer to see if anyone else has feedback.

Pushed, after a few very minor adjustments, mostly comments. Thanks
for the reviews and pointers. I think there are quite a lot of
refactoring and refinement opportunities unlocked by this change (I
have some draft proposals already), but for now I'll keep an eye on
the build farm.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-01-12 04:23:49 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-12 03:46:59 Re: Fixing a couple of buglets in how VACUUM sets visibility map bits