Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adam Lee <ali(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Melanie Plageman <mplageman(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Date: 2020-02-04 23:53:27
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJgTE09R6hzypdWDGsPn834n8qbHqbdBArq2A=ngxCxnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:08 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Parallel CREATE INDEX is currently accidentally disabled on the master
> branch. That should be fixed in the next couple of days. You can
> temporarily revert 74618e77 if you want to get it back for testing
> purposes today.

(Fixed -- sorry for the disruption.)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-02-05 00:00:22 Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-02-04 23:08:11 Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation