Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Date: 2020-05-13 02:30:09
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJZeRVpmaAK73=q9237jQx-Y1gpWdrs9RNu0pXA+cV2wg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> And then somebody else, unwilling to use either of those styles,
> thought it would be cute to do
>
> Hash/Batch/Allocating
> Hash/Batch/Electing
> Hash/Batch/Loading
> Hash/GrowBatches/Allocating

Perhaps we should also drop the 'ing' from the verbs, to be more like
...Read etc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-13 02:35:45 Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-05-13 02:26:49 Re: Inefficiency in SLRU stats collection