Re: How should we wait for recovery conflict resolution?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How should we wait for recovery conflict resolution?
Date: 2023-04-05 19:49:34
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJXmE6yMOnrURvcSY=YWZurvwfFFnaqd5nn92Rv50woUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 7:46 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Initially I was suspicious that there may be tricky races to deal with
> around that wakeup logic, and the poll/sleep loop was due to an
> inability to come up with something reliable.

(Oops lost a sentence) ... but then I realised that we're just using
the lock manager here (as opposed to a special purpose rarely used
signaling system), which had better work.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-04-05 19:58:28 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-04-05 19:46:36 How should we wait for recovery conflict resolution?