Re: SQL-standard function body

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2020-07-10 06:35:40
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJVjEccyThK=5-n+F=2NtpYQwVpyi3GLNFqFxjjDwyXCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:49 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> - More test coverage is needed. Surprisingly, there wasn't actually any
> test AFAICT that just creates and SQL function and runs it. Most of
> that code is tested incidentally, but there is very little or no
> targeted testing of this functionality.

FYI cfbot showed a sign of some kind of error_context_stack corruption
while running "DROP TABLE functest3 CASCADE;".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-07-10 06:36:07 Re: Log the location field before any backtrace
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-07-10 06:23:28 Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)