Re: LLVM compile failing in seawasp

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: didier <did447(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, buildfarm(at)coelho(dot)net
Subject: Re: LLVM compile failing in seawasp
Date: 2019-07-27 05:12:19
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJUGreiJART78O=pd4k9x0fZebL5BfGe8_mHBJe6Qd_WQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> didier <did447(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > c.h defines a C Min macro conflicting with llvm new class
> > llvm:ElementCount Min member
>
> Really? Well, we will hardly be the only code they broke with that.
> I think we can just wait for them to reconsider.

FYI This is now on LLVM's release_90 branch, due out on August 28.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-07-27 05:28:18 Re: proposal: type info support functions for functions that use "any" type
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-27 02:59:05 Re: SegFault on 9.6.14