Re: pg_upgrade and cross-library upgrades

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and cross-library upgrades
Date: 2023-07-05 06:00:25
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJTzOaPzi66nzCQ9kXWJRsu4Rk5WU3h5CTgnCwmUrruBA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 4:29 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thoughts?

I am grateful for all the bug discoveries that these Debian 7 animals
provided in their time, but at this point we're unlikely to learn
things that are useful to our mission from them. It costs our
community time to talk about each of these issues, re-discovering old
GCC bugs etc. If this were my animal and if the hardware couldn't be
upgraded to a modern distro for technical reasons like a de-supported
architecture, I would now disable HEAD, or more likely give the whole
machine a respectful send-off ceremony and move on.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2023-07-05 06:05:15 Dumping policy on a table belonging to an extension is expected?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-05 05:46:42 Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.