Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout
Date: 2019-03-19 19:40:47
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJRyJN9ucKL8Cx0xtksn6LfmVRS0cyse2ernYqdF2xtaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> So I'm inclined to (1) commit the patch as-proposed in HEAD, and
> (2) hack the ssl test cases in v11 as you suggested. If we see field
> complaints about this, we can consider reverting (2) in favor of
> a back-patch once v12 beta is over.

This plan looks good to me.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-19 20:00:50 Re: Online verification of checksums
Previous Message legrand legrand 2019-03-19 19:38:05 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?