Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable
Date: 2019-05-20 04:38:26
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJL_rN_M0nGur4gSkBz+Xy+y6Ps=LujWFSw-4MMraS6jQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:55 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I seem to recall that we expect tests to either work with
> default_transaction_isolation=serializable, or to set it to a different
> level where needed.

Here are a couple of bits where that is no longer necessary after bb16aba5.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
remove-bogus-iso-change.patch application/octet-stream 2.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rushabh Lathia 2019-05-20 04:42:40 Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-05-20 04:30:30 Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table