Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, greg(at)burd(dot)me
Subject: Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
Date: 2025-10-20 02:05:53
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJKqC2VSg8_MCB4_3air3Zhk8x8K99KxHtLuoFFdVFnvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Updating the list with some progress: Alexander narrowed it down to
pgaio_io_wait() being inlined into pgaio_io_was_recycled(). It seems
to have some instructions in the wrong order, and that can be
reproduced standalone, so I've asked about it here:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/164194

I'm not seeing how that could be our fault, but let's see...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-10-20 02:47:20 Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-10-20 02:01:31 Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE