Re: race condition when writing pg_control

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: race condition when writing pg_control
Date: 2020-06-02 22:56:13
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJJJOP1jfw4yRqozXghiqtXRH0gisHyNwa+nzCL_xyjcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:24 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 09:11:35PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback. I've attached a new set of patches.
>
> Thanks for splitting the set. 0001 and 0002 are the minimum set for
> back-patching, and it would be better to merge them together. 0003 is
> debatable and not an actual bug fix, so I would refrain from doing a
> backpatch. It does not seem that there is a strong consensus in favor
> of 0003 either.
>
> Thomas, are you planning to look at this patch set?

Sorry for my radio silence, I got tangled up with a couple of
conferences. I'm planning to look at 0001 and 0002 shortly.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-06-02 23:17:59 Re: Index Skip Scan
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2020-06-02 21:58:51 Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN