| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: index prefetching |
| Date: | 2025-08-15 01:49:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJEGiid8sD3XQKNVdC73=Xt-7P1c_L2i1k+taXa0MxS_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:47 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> (rather than introducing a secondary reference
> counting scheme in the WAL that I think you might be describing?), and
s/WAL/read stream/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-08-15 02:10:21 | RE: memory leak in logical WAL sender with pgoutput's cachectx |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-08-15 01:47:47 | Re: index prefetching |