| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
| Date: | 2019-09-10 00:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJA2Fowbi_S_GAZpjCyfr8b==Ycivp23uUU9YsFHa_oEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Adding to CF.
Rebased. An OID clashed so re-roll the dice. Also spotted a typo.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to--v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 13.9 KB |
| 0002-Introduce-xid8-variants-of-the-txid_XXX-fmgr-func-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 30.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-10 00:13:25 | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-09-09 23:43:09 | Re: Consolidate 'unique array values' logic into a reusable function? |