Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs
Date: 2020-08-01 00:16:51
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJ8JwXquJNDqiRcOB6o6AiYJu0a6dukvB+ijB1cMi_oQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 7:22 AM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [v2 patch set]

I ran it through pgindent which insisted on adding some newlines, I
manually replaced some spaces with tabs to match nearby lines, I added
some asterisks in your example function prototypes where <element> is
returned because they seemed to be missing, and I pushed this.
Thanks!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-08-01 00:23:00 Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2020-07-31 22:06:08 Confusing behavior of create table like