| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay |
| Date: | 2019-07-08 07:56:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+ydu5yfT9G70j7sT-4s4q3gtCZxm5UG2E0+K1-rry48A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:34 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2019-Jan-30, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> > I wonder if it can be considered as acceptable solution of the problem or
> > there can be some better approach?
>
> I didn't find one.
It sounds like you are in agreement that there is a problem and this
is the best solution. I didn't look at these patches, I'm just asking
with my Commitfest manager hat on: did I understand correctly, does
this need a TAP test, possibly the one Alvaro posted, and if so, could
we please have a fresh patch that includes the test, so we can see it
passing the test in CI?
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-08 07:57:40 | Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-08 07:40:33 | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |