| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT |
| Date: | 2023-03-02 01:20:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+wdis8FuTp9F2GoyLgZGUtQoBy-=OskH3kp91rEx6ebg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 1:09 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2023-03-02 12:29:28 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > ... Huh... what am I missing? I
> > thought the only risk was handlers running in the opposite of send
> > order because they 'overlapped', not non-handler code being allowed to
> > run in between.
>
> I see ProcessInterrupts() being called too - but it's independent of the
> changes we discuss here. The reason for it is the CFI() at the end of
> errfinish().
Ahh, right, I see.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-02 01:22:21 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-03-02 01:15:34 | Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext |