| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule |
| Date: | 2019-08-07 11:42:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+sdF7pE9cdFLXwKRL99TOdNLeDtBHepRL5d5WPvBT2FQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:28 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> The list of tests in src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule has grown
> over the years. Originally, they were all related to Serializable
> Snapshot Isolation, but there are different kinds of concurrency tests
> there now. More tests is good, but the schedule file has grown into a
> big inscrutable list with zero comments.
+1
> I propose to categorize the tests and add some divider comments to the
> file, see attached.
I think I'd put nowait and skip locked under a separate category "FOR
UPDATE" or "row locking" or something, but maybe that's just me... can
you call that stuff DML?
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-08-07 12:09:24 | Re: s/rewinded/rewound/? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-08-07 11:35:38 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |