On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:03 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Time: 47767,916 ms (00:47,768)
> Time: 32645,448 ms (00:32,645)
Just to make sure kernel caching isn't helping here, maybe try making
the table 2x or 4x bigger? My test was on a virtual machine with only
4GB RAM, so the table couldn't be entirely cached.
> How display " -> execution time 5.2s, average read size ="?
Execution time is what you showed, and average read size should be
inside the Windows performance window somewhere (not sure what it's
called).