Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Masayuki Takahashi <masayuki038(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan?
Date: 2019-05-02 18:06:14
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+qK3E2RF75PKfsV0sn2s018+ft--hUuCmd2R_yQ9tmPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 8:06 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was pinged off-list by someone who is working on a parallel-aware
> FDW, who asked if I still had the test code I mentioned up-thread.
> While digging that out, I couldn't resist hacking it a bit more until
> it gave the right answers, only sooner:

Here's a version that fixes an assertion failure when the regression
test tries to UPDATE a file_fdw table. That'll teach me to turn off
assertions for benchmarking, and then change something, and then post
a patch... Added to commitfest.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Make-file_fdw-parallel-aware-v2.patch application/octet-stream 14.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-02 19:38:02 Re: ERROR: failed to add item to the index page
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2019-05-02 18:03:23 Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking