Re: Assertion failure with barriers in parallel hash join

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure with barriers in parallel hash join
Date: 2020-09-29 08:12:13
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+bLAqknnDhWq5Q42+H1noUM7w9PhXo_2Uje74V3s01Bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> #2 0x00000000009027d2 in ExceptionalCondition
> (conditionName=conditionName(at)entry=0xa80846 "!barrier->static_party",

> #4 0x0000000000682ebf in ExecParallelHashJoinNewBatch

Thanks. Ohhh. I think I see how that condition was reached and what
to do about it, but I'll need to look more closely. I'm away on
vacation right now, and will update in a couple of days when I'm back
at a real computer.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com 2020-09-29 08:28:03 Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-09-29 08:08:46 Re: Improved Cost Calculation for IndexOnlyScan