Re: Removing obsolete configure checks

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 7:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> All of the above are required by C99 and/or SUSv2, and the configure-using
> >> buildfarm members are unanimous in reporting that they have them, and
> >> msvc/Solution.pm expects Windows to have them.
>
> > I think the same now applies to <wctype.h>, without gaur. So I
> > propose the attached. I split it into two patches, because 0001 is
> > based on scraping build farm configure output, while 0002 is an
> > educated guess and might finish up needing to be reverted if I'm
> > wrong.
>
> +1. SUSv2 is perfectly clear that <wctype.h> is supposed to declare
> these functions. I'm not surprised that gaur's 1996-ish system headers
> failed to see into the future; but prairiedog is up to speed on this
> point, and I should think all the surviving BF animals are too.

Thanks. After looking more closely I pushed it as one commit. (I
suspect that we have some redundant #includes around here but my
current mission is focused on redundant configure/portability gloop.)