Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Date: 2019-07-01 10:30:51
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+V+xXKVz=w+g6gQtZnYJqdwMuDcrSs=4DcKmDf3_9adQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:26 PM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> agree

Hi Surafel,

A new Commitfest is starting. Can you please post a fresh rebase of this patch?

Thanks,

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-01 10:41:55 Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-07-01 10:30:28 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb