Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
Date: 2022-01-14 22:01:44
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+QwSg7=P=YtgOdo6mzuz=gTPEUNAkMkMtcnX27mk1Chg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 10:59 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> (That patch is assuming that we're looking for something simple to
> back-patch, in the event that we decide not to just revert the
> graceful shutdown patch from back branches. Reverting might be a
> better idea for now, and then we could fix all this stuff going
> forward.)

(Though, as mentioned already, reverting isn't really enough either,
because other OSes that Windows might be talking to use lingering
sockets... and there may still be ways for this to break...)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shawn Debnath 2022-01-14 22:20:05 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-01-14 21:59:00 Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?