Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Donate
Your account
Quick Links
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
IRC
Local User Groups
Events
International Sites
Re: Add missing JIT inline pass for llvm>=17
From:
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: Add missing JIT inline pass for llvm>=17
Date:
2026-01-22 02:25:45
Message-ID:
CA+hUKG+H+2Lt6aTfAJ-TPF34siFe_yMeTpM+vwpWeqVdZBEtpg@mail.gmail.com
Views:
Whole Thread
|
Raw Message
|
Download mbox
|
Resend email
Thread:
2026-01-14 08:02:16 from Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> 📎
2026-01-15 02:33:13 from Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
2026-01-15 03:20:45 from Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
2026-01-15 09:40:37 from Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> 📎
2026-01-15 13:51:52 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2026-01-16 09:10:07 from Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> 📎
2026-01-20 19:03:45 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2026-01-21 21:08:37 from "Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
2026-01-22 02:25:45 from Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
2026-01-15 11:26:23 from Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
2026-01-16 09:29:59 from Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
2026-01-19 10:52:51 from Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Thanks all. I'll go ahead and push this.
In response to
Re: Add missing JIT inline pass for llvm>=17
at 2026-01-21 21:08:37 from Matheus Alcantara
Browse pgsql-hackers by date
From
Date
Subject
Next Message
Michael Paquier
2026-01-22 02:28:06
Re: Flush some statistics within running transactions
Previous Message
Thomas Munro
2026-01-22 02:24:56
Re: LLVM 22