Re: daitch_mokotoff module

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dag Lem <dag(at)nimrod(dot)no>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Date: 2022-01-03 01:47:05
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+Gs3WXzbT4OK9gEXpC1e221RafrPS4LVvcDDgDi20xAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 10:32 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2021-12-21 22:41:18 +0100, Dag Lem wrote:
> > This is my very first code contribution to PostgreSQL, and I would be
> > grateful for any advice on how to proceed in order to get the patch
> > accepted.
>
> Currently the tests don't seem to pass on any platform:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5941863248035840?logs=test_world#L572
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5941863248035840/regress_diffs/contrib/fuzzystrmatch/regression.diffs

Erm, it looks like something weird is happening somewhere in cfbot's
pipeline, because Dag's patch says:

+SELECT daitch_mokotoff('Straßburg');
+ daitch_mokotoff
+-----------------
+ 294795
+(1 row)

... but it's failing like:

SELECT daitch_mokotoff('Straßburg');
daitch_mokotoff
-----------------
- 294795
+ 297950
(1 row)

It's possible that I broke cfbot when upgrading to Python 3 a few
months back (ie encoding snafu when using the "requests" module to
pull patches down from the archives). I'll try to fix this soon.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-01-03 02:41:53 Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-01-02 23:22:23 Re: Index-only scans vs. partially-retrievable indexes