| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug?] EXPLAIN outputs 0 for rows and width in cost estimate for update nodes |
| Date: | 2021-01-20 08:20:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG++esspqBytR6A6f+J+dwvxDhd7Q-NRHWOtoZCEiXv10Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:12 PM tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> This behavior may possibly be considered as an intended behavior for the reason that Update/Insert/Delete nodes don't output rows without RETURNING. Is this a bug or a correct behavior?
Hi Tsunakawa-san,
This was a change made deliberately. Do you see a problem?
commit f0f13a3a08b2757997410f3a1c38bdc22973c525
Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Mon Oct 12 20:41:16 2020 +1300
Fix estimates for ModifyTable paths without RETURNING.
In the past, we always estimated that a ModifyTable node would emit the
same number of rows as its subpaths. Without a RETURNING clause, the
correct estimate is zero. Fix, in preparation for a proposed parallel
write patch that is sensitive to that number.
A remaining problem is that for RETURNING queries, the estimated width
is based on subpath output rather than the RETURNING tlist.
Reviewed-by: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-cXnB5cnMKqWEp2E2z7Mvcd04iLVmV%3DqpFJr
R3AcrTS3g%40mail.gmail.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-01-20 08:34:44 | Re: Wrong usage of RelationNeedsWAL |
| Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-01-20 08:12:34 | [bug?] EXPLAIN outputs 0 for rows and width in cost estimate for update nodes |