| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Terminate the idle sessions |
| Date: | 2021-01-07 05:40:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG++BE=w-P9JzS0SkTRpmcDctSjafk6JZ5+6QxoZurPkzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > One of the strange things about these errors is that they're
> > asynchronous/unsolicited, but they appear to the client to be the
> > response to their next request (if it doesn't eat ECONNRESET instead).
>
> Right, which is what makes class 57 (operator intervention) seem
> attractive to me. From the client's standpoint these look little
> different from ERRCODE_ADMIN_SHUTDOWN or ERRCODE_CRASH_SHUTDOWN,
> which are in that category.
Yeah, that's a good argument.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2021-01-07 05:49:25 | Re: [PATCH] Runtime control of CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-01-07 05:07:15 | Re: plpgsql variable assignment with union is broken |