On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 12:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm inclined to do more or less the attached, which also fixes what
> seems a thinko in the existing text: we should say that clients still
> support standard_conforming_strings = off, not
> escape_string_warning = off.
>
Thanks Tom. Good point about views, defaults, and function bodies.
I was only thinking about the data rows. Your v2 looks good to me.
Thanks,
Baji Shaik.