Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?

From: Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?
Date: 2017-11-03 14:17:19
Message-ID: CA+cVU8Oxi_p4DMJ_n42_7X4PfqC0Y4f3NXQOggFKvNYMFnCk=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi Thomas,

The PgJDBC driver do not rely on the libpq library, the driver implements
everything in pure Java.

Jorge Solórzano

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> The Postgres JDBC driver offers a way to specify multiple hosts in the
> connection URL:
>
> https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/connect.html
> #connection-failover
>
> However, it is unclear to me if that feature relies on the libpq feature
> introduced in Postgres 10:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connec
> t.html#libpq-multiple-hosts
>
> or if this is handled by the driver internally?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-11-03 14:19:39 Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?
Previous Message Jorge Solórzano 2017-11-03 14:04:54 Re: Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?