From: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |
Date: | 2017-11-03 14:17:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+cVU8Oxi_p4DMJ_n42_7X4PfqC0Y4f3NXQOggFKvNYMFnCk=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Thomas,
The PgJDBC driver do not rely on the libpq library, the driver implements
everything in pure Java.
Jorge Solórzano
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> The Postgres JDBC driver offers a way to specify multiple hosts in the
> connection URL:
>
> https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/connect.html
> #connection-failover
>
> However, it is unclear to me if that feature relies on the libpq feature
> introduced in Postgres 10:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connec
> t.html#libpq-multiple-hosts
>
> or if this is handled by the driver internally?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-11-03 14:19:39 | Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |
Previous Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2017-11-03 14:04:54 | Re: Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0? |