| From: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Malcolm Studd <malcolm(dot)studd(at)tradingcentral(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0 |
| Date: | 2017-02-03 13:53:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+cVU8O_iLzwS0HfyzdRx47BUWcftQjV6tMyFZSKn6GwtYyjYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 3 February 2017 at 07:16, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> TL;DR: I suggest to review "feat: use java.util.logging", test it, merge
>> it and release the resulting artifact as pgjdbc 42.0.0
>>
>> Are there any concerns regarding that plan?
>>
>> I haven't had a good look at it. Does the old way of enabling it work ?
> Does anyone care ?
>
Hi Dave, the old way of enabling it do not work. Maybe we can start a new
thread
asking if anyone care, I really hope that nobody cares, since it have the
potential of break compatibility if someone is using the old way for
something more than debug localy.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2017-02-03 13:56:09 | Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0 |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2017-02-03 12:30:23 | Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0 |