From: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Top posting.... |
Date: | 2017-05-11 17:04:44 |
Message-ID: | CA+bJJbyutGGOKN-wiBDeLrNU-oB=_-81xEnfXRcY0wo+ZRKvZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Slightly unrelated...
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Gavin Flower
<GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
> It is normal on this list not to top post, but rather to add comments at the
> end (so people can see the context) - though interspersed comments in the
> body of the text is okay when appropriate!
I'd rather say interspersed comments with the TRIMMED text body is the
appropiate thing to do. Bottom posting ( edited ) being a particular
case of that when only a single topic/question is being answered.
Full quoting ( I mean the people which even quotes others signatures )
is especially ugly, combined with top posting I feel it as insulting (
to me it feels as 'you do not deserve me taking time to edit a bit and
make things clear' ) ( but well, I started when all the university
multiplexed over a 9600bps link, so I may be a bit extreme on this )
Regards.
Francisco Olarte.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hunley, Douglas | 2017-05-11 17:07:07 | Re: How to recover my postgres database ? |
Previous Message | Jean-Francois Bernier | 2017-05-11 17:03:55 | Re: Querying a policy |