Re: Basic Question on Point In Time Recovery

From: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
To: Robert Inder <robert(at)interactive(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic Question on Point In Time Recovery
Date: 2015-03-14 11:22:05
Message-ID: CA+bJJbxukB5ZRbp38tmxunJAMk=6-sNGLL8ntoU-LtJ3LJRcDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Robert:

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Inder <robert(at)interactive(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> On 11 March 2015 at 17:32, Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is, build an streaming replication slave, pg_dump from the slave. If
>> needed, restore in the master.
...
> I really like the idea of running pg_dump on the slave, but I don't understand
> how I could do it.
....
> Or Is this something that has changed with Postgres 9?
> We're currently running Postgres 8.4.
> Is this my specific reason to embark on an upgrade?

It's been answered before, but yes, streaming replication is a (
someone may say THE ) 9.0 feature. My fault, I've been using it for so
long I forgot the past. If you are using log shipping I would
recommend some tests and considering an upgrade, I've found
replication is much simpler and easier with it.

Regards.
Francisco Olarte.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-14 15:29:11 Re: regclass and format('%I')
Previous Message Francisco Olarte 2015-03-14 11:09:04 Re: Basic Question on Point In Time Recovery