| From: | Manuel Reyes Bravo <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrey Rachitskiy <pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19638: Planner chooses an index-only scan for an index AM without amcanreturn, and execution fails |
| Date: | 2026-08-24 19:42:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+bCEdCJJ2yWqqN+9+saQE3JFxjMr3LsMjbyoCrzJ5AWFbk8cQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Agreed, v3 fixed this.
Confirmed on 18.6. v3 applies with a 2-line offset and passes everything I
threw at the previous one:
the #19638 reproducer Seq Scan (disabled) -> 3, correct
count(*) over i_expr Index Only Scan (kept)
count(*) over i_col Index Only Scan (unchanged)
SELECT FROM t_nokey Seq Scan (disabled), correct
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ...) Seq Scan (disabled), correct
make check all 231 tests passed
Tracking any_canreturn inside the existing loop is nicer than the separate
pass I suggested -- one traversal, and it reads as part of building the
bitmap rather than as an afterthought.
Nothing further from me on this one.
El lun, 24 ago 2026 a las 15:34, Andrey Rachitskiy (<pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com>)
escribió:
>
> пн, 24 авг. 2026 г. в 23:52, Manuel Reyes Bravo <
> manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> unpatched: Aggregate -> Index Only Scan using i_expr on t_expr
> patched: Aggregate -> Seq Scan on t_expr (disabled)
>
> Agreed, v3 fixed this.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rachitskiy Andrey
>
--
Saludos cordiales,
Manuel Reyes
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-08-24 22:06:33 | Re: autovacuum: automatically propagate updated parameters |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-08-24 19:42:00 | Re: autovacuum: automatically propagate updated parameters |