| From: | Andy Pogrebnoi <andrew(dot)pogrebnoi(at)percona(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Lowering the default wal_blocksize to 4K |
| Date: | 2026-07-22 15:31:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+aWR132j=zxOCRBub8QE+jm6rfA=SehGeeDY9f2enHGLpf5yQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 4:04 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Unfortunately not much has happened on that front. But in the course of the
> investigation I discovered the gcc flag "fpch-deps". I think we should
> inject
> that in our build, if supported by the compiler. I don't really see a
> downside
> and it does avoid the issue at hand, based on my experiments.
>
The CI test seems like have passed [1] after committing the "fpch-deps"
build changes [2]
Do we need anything else to move this forward?
[1]
https://github.com/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/actions/runs/29929341221/job/88955204178
[2]
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=cf9d76d78d69aa0b11a50a50b31aa83506304cac
---
Cheers,
Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2026-07-22 16:00:04 | Re: Add a pg_wal_preallocate() SQL function to eagerly create future WAL segments |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2026-07-22 15:29:35 | Re: [PATCH] Batched clock sweep to reduce cross-socket atomic contention |