Re: [PATCH] Porting small OpenBSD changes.

From: David CARLIER <devnexen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Porting small OpenBSD changes.
Date: 2017-11-20 18:57:47
Message-ID: CA+XhMqyKp+g5pA5tojqCKNa8rjx3_4ESZJ_fQweJ8n4kNdN1oA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20 November 2017 at 18:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> David CARLIER <devnexen(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > - Reducing OpenBSD postfgresql maintainer internal changes bookeeping if
> > those small changes make sense for the PostgreSQL developers.
>
> Hm. The s_lock.c change is surely fine if OpenBSD maintainers say it is.
>
> Not sure about adding Motorola 88K support to s_lock.h ... is anybody
> really still interested in that platform?

Yes there is :-)

> OTOH, we still have M68K
> and VAX stanzas in that file, so I suppose it's silly to complain
> about 88K. A bigger issue is that I wonder whether that code has
> ever been tested: it does not look to me like the __asm__ call is
> even syntactically correct. There should be colons in it.
>
>
True :-) corrected. Thanks.

> regards, tom lane
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-PATCH-1-1-Porting-OpenBSD-internal-changes.patch application/octet-stream 1.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2017-11-20 19:09:54 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-20 18:49:58 Re: [PATCH] Porting small OpenBSD changes.