Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Date: 2013-11-24 16:09:04
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLkw4R_Ze7KjzhQ44Z5-Rs7M2vs0T+uC06QEsWUoLzajA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 November 2013 16:51, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Definitely separate yes. And I agree, it's partially moot if Heikki's
> patch gets in, but I am not sure it will make it into 9.4. There seems
> to be quite some work left.

I'd prefer to do all 3 patches in one release. Don't mind which one.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-11-24 16:20:44 Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-11-24 15:03:53 Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype