From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Karl Hafner <karl(at)scoreloop(dot)com> |
Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Strahinja Kustudic <strahinjak(at)nordeus(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MultiXactId Error in Autovacuum |
Date: | 2013-12-03 09:12:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLkCGbOiHSvCn2M563q=_quw8Sy3vcZSQXSwnAMSfYm8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 3 December 2013 08:55, Karl Hafner <karl(at)scoreloop(dot)com> wrote:
> We are wondering it there is a deeper reason behind treating case (a) and
> (b) in a different way or if it would be better to get rid of these
> inconsistencies in future postgres versions.
I believe your problems have been fixed in the latest point release, 9.3.2
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jorge Torralba | 2013-12-05 17:14:29 | pg_archivecleanup issues |
Previous Message | Karl Hafner | 2013-12-03 08:55:54 | Re: MultiXactId Error in Autovacuum |