Re: MultiXactId Error in Autovacuum

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Karl Hafner <karl(at)scoreloop(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Strahinja Kustudic <strahinjak(at)nordeus(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MultiXactId Error in Autovacuum
Date: 2013-12-03 09:12:43
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLkCGbOiHSvCn2M563q=_quw8Sy3vcZSQXSwnAMSfYm8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 3 December 2013 08:55, Karl Hafner <karl(at)scoreloop(dot)com> wrote:

> We are wondering it there is a deeper reason behind treating case (a) and
> (b) in a different way or if it would be better to get rid of these
> inconsistencies in future postgres versions.

I believe your problems have been fixed in the latest point release, 9.3.2

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jorge Torralba 2013-12-05 17:14:29 pg_archivecleanup issues
Previous Message Karl Hafner 2013-12-03 08:55:54 Re: MultiXactId Error in Autovacuum