From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH]Tablesample Submission |
Date: | 2013-01-17 19:04:47 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLTSkRomv7YHqvTS3E5iSqq+vS7MCDrr=ZqOg7Qx5k86g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 January 2013 18:32, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 07:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
>> Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't notice the one for me, my mail box configuration problem. I am still kind of busy with my university final year project. I shall not have time to work on updating the patch until this semester finishes which is December. I will work on then. Thanks.
>> Best RegardsHuang Qi VictorComputer Science of National University of Singapore
>
> Did you ever do the update of the patch?
We aren't just waiting for a rebase, we're waiting for Hitoshi's
comments to be addressed.
I would add to them by saying I am very uncomfortable with the idea of
allowing a TABLESAMPLE clause on an UPDATE or a DELETE. If you really
want that you can use a sub-select.
Plus the patch contains zero documentation.
So I can't see this going anywhere for 9.3. I've moved it to CF1 of
9.4 marked Waiting on Author
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-01-17 19:19:38 | Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-17 19:01:30 | Re: could not create directory "...": File exists |