Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()
Date: 2012-12-21 18:01:55
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLNmeFMB=9u1Hyj4CPSDzH+SUFzKMbCp6T-DXpmB6OSWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 December 2012 14:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> As ever, we spent much energy on debating backwards compatibility
>>> rather than just solving the problem it posed, which is fairly easy
>>> to
>>> solve.
>>
>> Well, IIRC, the debate was primarily of *your* making. Almost everyone else on the thread was fine with the original patch, and it was nearly done for 9.2 before you stepped in. I can't find anyone else on that thread who thought that backwards compatibility was more important than fixing the API.

Then you're forgetting the thread. If you reread it you will find I
was not alone.

> +1. Let's JFDI.

Agreed, lets get on with solving the problem rather than continuing a
debate that could have been avoided, and can stop any time people
choose to let it.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-12-21 18:13:18 Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-21 17:45:13 improving PL/Python builds on OS X