Re: bug of recovery?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Date: 2011-09-26 19:06:41
Message-ID: CA+U5nML8aK6iMpnaXf=vGYLCRkdqKUFJ6nTLTjEVpLj6oYYTRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Currently, if a reference to an invalid page is found during recovery,
> its information
> is saved in hash table "invalid_page_tab". Then, if such a reference
> is resolved,
> its information is removed from the hash table. If there is unresolved
> reference to
> an invalid page in the hash table at the end of recovery, PANIC error occurs.
>
> What I'm worried about is that the hash table is volatile. If a user restarts
> the server before reaching end of recovery, any information in the
> hash table is lost,
> and we wrongly miss the PANIC error case because we cannot find any unresolved
> reference. That is, even if database is corrupted at the end of recovery,
> a user might not be able to notice that. This looks like a serious problem. No?
>
> To prevent the above problem, we should write the contents of the hash table to
> the disk for every restartpoints, I think. Then, when the server
> starts recovery,
> it should reload the hash table from the disk. Thought? Am I missing something?

That doesn't happen because the when we stop the server it will
restart from a valid restartpoint - one where there is no in-progress
multi-phase operation.

So when it replays it will always replay both parts of the operation.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2011-09-26 19:07:56 Re: psql setenv command
Previous Message Brar Piening 2011-09-26 18:57:25 Re: Support UTF-8 files with BOM in COPY FROM