From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
Date: | 2011-10-29 09:02:35 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nML3v9OF19N5BnF3o+qUUcs7OdWsQHnhzXifGma7vOzTLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>> * Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
>>>
>>> Same for this one.
>>
>> Will commit by end of Monday
>
> There are plenty of source comments (and probably documents) describing that
> checkpoint is performed by bgwriter, but the patch that you posted
> didn't correct
> them. Are you going to include the change of them in the patch? Or commit
> separately?
Yes, I will resolve all your comments either in first commit, or ones
immediately following. Thank you again for making those observations.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-29 10:45:08 | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-10-29 07:45:46 | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |