| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) |
| Date: | 2012-09-19 20:13:51 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKxiFcmuBd+xgCc73Yb1-cdT_AYayO_ZCnbwuvq8VOv1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12 September 2012 04:30, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:09 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of vie jun 29 09:11:23 -0400 2012:
>
>>> We have some use cases for this patch, when can you post
>>> a new version? I would test and review it.
>
>> What use cases do you have in mind?
>
> Wouldn't it be helpful for some features like parallel query in future?
Trying to solve that is what delayed this patch, so the scope of this
needs to be "permanent daemons" rather than dynamically spawned worker
tasks.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-09-19 20:26:03 | Re: Invalid optimization of VOLATILE function in WHERE clause? |
| Previous Message | Daniel Browning | 2012-09-19 20:05:44 | CTE optimization fence on the todo list? |