Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
Date: 2012-01-20 14:37:38
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKoySYKWTMWd9UfhHqicVA8EAxfc5wCyBB4LndvQ4Xcog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20.01.2012 15:32, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's another version of the patch to make XLogInsert less of a
>>> bottleneck
>>> on multi-CPU systems. The basic idea is the same as before, but several
>>> bugs
>>> have been fixed, and lots of misc. clean up has been done.
>>
>>
>> This seems to need a rebase.
>
>
> Here you go.

I put myself down as reviewer for this. I'm planning to review this
early next week, once I've finished Fujii-san's patches.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-20 14:37:54 Re: Inline Extension
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-01-20 14:34:31 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby