Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2012-12-03 13:16:36
Message-ID: CA+U5nMK_WSz774-nPSqbZWG0k5ewsyokz4+c3XeU5RhDbLK7xA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3 December 2012 09:56, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I think the way forwards for this is...
>
> 1. Break out the changes around inCommit flag, since that is just
> uncontroversial refactoring. I can do that. That reduces the noise
> level in the patch and makes it easier to understand the meaningful
> changes.

Done.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-03 13:18:52 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-03 12:42:00 Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel