From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backup docs |
Date: | 2012-06-05 13:50:02 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMK3EuVMqxSXO57YGTYfqAD10oFHmuL1w0-mtx1FBJvXJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 June 2012 14:43, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> In reference to:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/continuous-archiving.html
>
> I would like to see that page changed to list pg_basebackup as the
> "default" way of doing base backups, and then list the "manual way" as
> an option if you need more flexibility.
Agreed, but prefer phrasing old approach as "lower level API" or similar.
> The reason being that for the majority of users that's going to be
> flexible enough, and it's easier to use. And it doesn't hurt to show
> that setting these things up really doesn't have to be that hard.
>
> But since I'm definitely slightly biased on this, I'm not going to go
> changing anything, or even write up suggested changing, until I can
> get some agreement that making this change is good in the first place
> ;) Thus, please...
>
> I'd also like to add "pg_basebackup -x" under standalone hot backups,
> again as the main option.
>
>
> I also wonder if we need a tl;dr; section of that whole page that just
> goes through *what to do*, rather than why we do it? Of course not
> removing the details, just showing the simplest case in, um, a simpler
> way?
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-05 14:01:28 | Re: "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-06-05 13:49:43 | Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea |