Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages
Date: 2012-11-08 22:40:43
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJt4ZrqDdG6gDdF5ayyZGLz-RzThtaXqpyE+JzZ++FhJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 November 2012 20:36, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It does not seem outrageous to me that there would be real-world
> conditions in which invalidations would be sent more than once a
> minute over prolonged periods, so this total starvation seems like a
> bug.

Yes, its a bug, but do you really believe the above? In what cases?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-11-08 22:50:12 Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-08 22:24:52 Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages