| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: after failover? |
| Date: | 2011-10-16 19:21:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJpVn0tCohUTroVJRusxiZFoL4yucsSZTES83928aH67g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
> The tutorial here excludes an important issue:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Binary_Replication_Tutorial#Failing_Over_To_The_Standby
> After the failover is complete, it seems like a restart is required to
> make the new primary capable of supporting a new hot standby. Can the
> config values be changed without an interuption of service? I'm using
> a hotstandby config in 9.0.x. Anything different in this regard in 9.1?
> Thanks.
There's no reason not to have wal_level = hot_standby on the standby also.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vibhor Kumar | 2011-10-17 10:54:02 | Re: flashback concept in postgres |
| Previous Message | Cliff Pratt | 2011-10-16 05:32:27 | Re: Contents of WAL files |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ray Stell | 2011-10-17 13:44:56 | Re: after failover? |
| Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2011-10-15 17:21:52 | Re: PQconninfoParse() |